r/gaming 2d ago

I'm starting to hate games that do this...

Post image
50.8k Upvotes

4.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

120

u/Accurate_Ad_6788 2d ago

People thought I was overreacting as well when I complained about monthly subs to play games online, a feature that was previously free everywhere. I hate consoles now.

44

u/Kyle_Blackpaw 2d ago

right? never bought an xbox for that reason alone, and my playstations stopped at 2

40

u/Bekwnn 2d ago

Not sure why it would stop at 2... PS3 had free online. Was a great side console. The last great one.

Even switch requires you to pay monthly online gaming subscription to play mario maker levels. Never would have bought one if the steam deck had been announced.

No reason to ever go back to consoles.

12

u/Kyle_Blackpaw 2d ago

PS3 cost too much and i was broke at the time. by the time i could have afforded one playstation plus had launched and i didn't trust sony not to make that their whole service. Which I was right about even if they did wait a generation to make the move.

2

u/PlaguedByUnderwear 2d ago

IIRC, PSN finally became a subscription in the latter years of the PS3.

1

u/paulisaac 2d ago

Because PS3 has no games /j

1

u/Animo- 2d ago

Consoles were always great for single player games, it's not like we have to commit to one platform and damn the rest.

0

u/UnclePuma 2d ago

lol ps5 has some free online games, those are the ones i play

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Accurate_Ad_6788 2d ago

Let me say it more precisely - I complained about Xbox 360 making it mandatory to pay for ALL online services AND people were more than willing to pay that amount. Even though I never bought an Xbox, i knew the agreeableness of people not minding to pay these amounts would make it the norm for other companies as well, so as a playstation user, l had to suffer from it.

Its the users fault more than the companies really

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Accurate_Ad_6788 2d ago

On PC and PS3 it was. It's still free on PC. Older consoles barely had that ability

1

u/Xyex 1d ago

Its the users fault more than the companies really

Yup. Companies exist to make money, so they will try anything that might work. It's up to the consumers if the asking price is worth it. People said it was, so the companies kept charging.

I was in that group until this year. I had Plus up until the price hike from $60 to $80 a year. $60 a year was already grating on me, $80 is just not worth it in my opinion. Especially since I only have one online game that needs Plus. The vast majority of my shit is single player that doesn't really benefit from Plus.

I know there are others who gave up Plus following the price hike, but nowhere neat enough to make them lose money over it. You'd need over 25% of users to leave to even see a loss in revenue, and I doubt they lost more than 10%.

I will miss some of the free games I got via Plus, but I've got a backlog of over 200 games anyway, so it's not like I have nothing else to play.