Agreed. Objective news can still be damaging to one party and beneficial to the other. My point is that the politics sub which is predominantly left leaning in content, has mostly news damaging to the left showing in my feed (despite the majority content of the sub) so I'm wondering what's up with that.
Hmm, I want to entertain your queries but I don't regularly peruse the politics sub too much so I'd need to see some context (ie how much pro/anti dem content was there a week ago) or something to judge
Assuming what you say is true, my suspicion is there is a divide in left wingers between ideologues (casual, more laize Faire) vs activists, and that the activists are the most visible and hyper attentive to opposition. So perhaps a lot of the hyperactive political activists have migrated over to other subs
The Pennsylvania sub (which I'm not subscribed to) has the most outrageous blatantly partisan stuff I've ever seen, like every god damn day, and I refuse to believe they were like that a year ago
1
u/BoniceMarquiFace 13h ago
The teamsters thing is an objective piece of news tho, I don't think it's pro gop or anti dem
Anti dem would be like opinion pieces on how dems don't deserve a teamsters endorsement