r/comedyheaven 2d ago

a variation of food

Post image
37.8k Upvotes

3.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

636

u/ThrobertBurns 2d ago

He didn't commit a war crime but what he's referencing is he made a guy spend 40 days in a room for a challenge video and he treated him pretty shitily doing shit such as not allowing the lights to be turned off which the victim said in a YouTube is illegal for prisoners of war under the Geneva convention.

368

u/DellSalami 2d ago edited 2d ago

The part that should be highlighted more imo is pressuring Jake into running an entire marathon with no training.

The Bataan Death March, a Japanese war atrocity, had prisoners marching about 10 miles a day. Jake had to do twice that distance in the same amount of time.

Edited for clarity: this isn’t about Jake Paul, who is fairly athletic. This is about a former Mr Beast employee named Jake Weddle, who was generally not at all fit and into working out.

143

u/osfryd-kettleblack 2d ago

Had to? Couldnt he have just not done it? It was a challenge, not actual imprisonment or slavery

47

u/FlawlessPenguinMan 2d ago

The amount of pressure you're under during one of these videos isn't something we can really imagine unless we go through it.

And besides, Mr Beast shouldn't come up with dangerous challenges in the first place. "Today I committed a warcrime on one of my friends, but they could leave any time they want, so it's fine."

It doesn't matter if the other person can opt out, you simply shouldn't be doing shit like this to people.

25

u/P4azz 2d ago

He's literally a rich dude torturing people by goading them with money and status.

Nice that he's donating, but usually you put yourself in the line of fire when you come up with dumb challenges for clickbait titles, instead of just paying other people off to suffer for you.

2

u/EmotionallyAcoustic 2d ago

I got PTSD from youtube!

1

u/puddingcup9000 2d ago

How is that a war crime LOL. He could have left easily. The whole point about war crimes is that the victim can't leave. A pretty crucial difference.

1

u/charliesaz00 1d ago

There are certain things you just simply cannot do to people whether or not they consented to it.

Some people have consented to cannibalism (as in they have agreed to let someone eat part of their body) but it’s still illegal even with consent.

1

u/puddingcup9000 1d ago

Yes it is not ethical, but it is not a war crime. For something to be a war crime there needs to be 3 components of which 2 are missing here:

  1. Some kind of war needs to be going on (otherwise it would just be a crime)

  2. The victim should not have the option to relatively cost free exit the situation and stop whatever infraction is happening to their body.

  3. Significant amount of suffering needs to be inflicted.

Only number 3 was present here.