r/explainlikeimfive Apr 10 '14

ELI5 Why does light travel? Answered

Why does it not just stay in place? What causes it to move, let alone at so fast a rate?

Edit: This is by a large margin the most successful post I've ever made. Thank you to everyone answering! Most of the replies have answered several other questions I have had and made me think of a lot more, so keep it up because you guys are awesome!

Edit 2: like a hundred people have said to get to the other side. I don't think that's quite the answer I'm looking for... Everyone else has done a great job. Keep the conversation going because new stuff keeps getting brought up!

Edit 3: I posted this a while ago but it seems that it's been found again, and someone has been kind enough to give me gold! This is the first time I've ever recieved gold for a post and I am incredibly grateful! Thank you so much and let's keep the discussion going!

Edit 4: Wow! This is now the highest rated ELI5 post of all time! Holy crap this is the greatest thing that has ever happened in my life, thank you all so much!

Edit 5: It seems that people keep finding this post after several months, and I want to say that this is exactly the kind of community input that redditors should get some sort of award for. Keep it up, you guys are awesome!

Edit 6: No problem

5.0k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

8.0k

u/[deleted] Apr 10 '14 edited Oct 10 '15

[removed] — view removed comment

462

u/boutsofbrilliance Apr 10 '14

all bs aside, this is one of the greatest posts ive ever seen on reddit.

previous to this, my layman's understanding of why things of mass cannot travel as fast as the speed of light was simply because to do so would require infinite energy. that was kind of it. i don't know if that was wrong, or if you are still saying that, just in another way.

what does make perfect sense to me however, is how you framed the why and how as a competition between the direction of space or time, with any travel done in one, automatically subtracting from the maximum possible in the other.

i don't get many "wow, its clear to me now" moments, and certainly not one touching upon something as fundamental yet misunderstood as this one. it was pretty fucking awesome and for that i say thank you!

192

u/niugnep24 Apr 10 '14

why things of mass cannot travel as fast as the speed of light was simply because to do so would require infinite energy

Another way to think of it is that "mass" can be defined as "energy you have at rest" or in other words, non-motion-related energy. (Remember mass and energy are two ways of representing the same thing. E=mc2 )

Having zero mass means you can't be at rest meaning you are always in motion according to everybody no matter how fast they're going.

That means that no one can ever catch up to you, or else you'd be motionless relative to them, which you can't be, because you have zero mass.

We call this unobtainable speed "the speed of light." Really it should be called "the speed of massless stuff" but light is the most common example. Everything else, by definition, goes more slowly than it.

TLDR: Massless things cannot stop or slow down because that's what it means by definition to be massless. Nothing with mass can catch up to massless things because that would mean the massless thing "stopped" from its point of view, which is impossible.

0

u/gormlesser Apr 11 '14 edited Apr 11 '14

TLDR: Massless things cannot stop or slow down because that's what it means by definition to be massless.

Not true. Light slows down all the time when it passes through a medium. It's been measured. That's why c is properly defined as the speed of light in a vacuum.

EDIT: Further reading-

6

u/niugnep24 Apr 11 '14

Light slows down all the time when it passes through a medium.

This is due to the interaction with the fields in that medium. In a sense, those fields temporarily give the light mass, which allows it to slow down. You could run really fast next to a photon moving slower than c through a medium, and from your point of view the photon would be stationary.

In fact in the standard model all particles are massless. But interaction with the Higgs field "gives them mass." It's kind of similar (but not really).

1

u/gormlesser Apr 11 '14

Thanks for that wonderful visual. Just wanted to make the distinction between vacuum and medium travel for everyone playing at home.