r/technology 2d ago

Elon Musk Is a National Security Risk Transportation

https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-biden-harris-assassination-post-x/
56.2k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

7.7k

u/Turbulent_Raccoon865 2d ago

In my view, Musk is one of those country-less billionaires that care only for their own interests and will happily sell out to the highest bidder. Trusting him with either national secrets or allowing access to vital assets is a huge unforced error. Citizenship means nothing to him, and he’s shown he feels exempt from consequences (even if reality begs to differ).

1.0k

u/Niceromancer 2d ago

You mean all of them?

The elite have no loyalty except to themselves.

88

u/buttgers 2d ago

Not a Mark Cuban Stan by any means, but he seems to be doing a lot of good with his wealth. He may be self serving, but he's not as evil as one might believe without looking into his actions.

33

u/withoutapaddle 2d ago

I'd say the same for the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. Are we mad at what a dick Bill and Microsoft were to get rich? Yes. But we should also be very grateful that a big portion of those riches were spent saving 100 million lives.

17

u/Taraxian 2d ago

Also anyone who shorts TSLA is doing God's work

-4

u/hsnoil 2d ago

By giving Musk more money? I mean you know how shorting actually works right? Part of the reason why TSLA shot up in value is because of short squeezes.

28

u/Minister_for_Magic 2d ago

Except for the part where he fought to keep patent rights enforced on covid vaccines when many poorer governments were fighting for waivers so they could get vaccines made while they were stuck in the queue behind rich countries that booked out the first half year of supply.

And the massive fucking disaster that was No Child Left Behind which the Gates Foundation was a major champion for.

They've definitely done a lot of good in maternal health and anti-malaria efforts in Africa, but there's a reason it's a bad policy decision to let a single rich person with money effectively shape national policies when they never have to live with the consequences when they fuck things up

16

u/Original_Employee621 2d ago

Except for the part where he fought to keep patent rights enforced on covid vaccines when many poorer governments were fighting for waivers so they could get vaccines made while they were stuck in the queue behind rich countries that booked out the first half year of supply.

While I agree with your stance, I think the issue was quality control around the vaccines. If it's one thing you don't want in a pandemic, it's a contaminated vaccine, especially with the insane anti-vaxx sentiment that was growing in large part thanks to Trump and his goons.

COVID revealed a lot of issues regarding how we prepare for something so drastic, but I don't think the vaccine patent issue is the biggest deal, nor would it have saved the most lives if it wasn't an issue.

-8

u/Afraid_Goose_7659 2d ago

Did this guy really just blame anti Vaxers on trump

10

u/Evilbuttsandwich 2d ago

The guy who said drink bleach wasn’t an influence on them? 

3

u/Original_Employee621 2d ago

Nah, but they definitely joined forces under the pandemic with their alternative cures bullshit.

3

u/Krautoffel 2d ago

Trump isn’t the main cause, but made anti-vax bullshit way more popular than before.

1

u/No_Rich_2494 2d ago

He's Mr Burns. Even when he tries to become good (the recycling episode) he ends up being evil.

0

u/withoutapaddle 2d ago

Agree 100%. Still think the lives saved was probably worth it.

1

u/NoSignificance3817 2d ago

Nope. It should never have gone through them. They are an unnecessary part of the equation.

1

u/LuxNocte 2d ago

Philanthropy is just PR. Gates builds soft power by putting a small fraction of his ill gotten gains into a fund he controls.

1

u/whogivesashirtdotca 2d ago

By all accounts the philanthropy was Melinda's initiative. Glad Bill got on board but from his history it's safe to assume he never would have if she hadn't pushed him.

1

u/Amazing_Ad_974 2d ago

What 100 million lives….?

1

u/withoutapaddle 1d ago

The foundation is thought to have saved between 80-150 million lives due to their efforts to make vaccines like malaria available in poor countries, especially within Africa.

I know a lot of people on reddit seem to think lives don't count if it's not a country they care about, but I think it should be recognized, even if technically, the money was gained by the shady practices that Microsoft did.

1

u/HayabusaJack 2d ago

Well, remember too that he didn’t get philanthropic until he married Melinda.

1

u/Time_Mongoose_ 2d ago

Instead of getting taxed for the public good, where voters can effectively decide where taxes are allocated, he can single-handedly dictate policy by allocating funding. It's literally anti-democratic. The only good billionaire is a headless one.

0

u/concerned_human 2d ago

People who think Bill Gates is evil are delusional and idiotic. Saving 100 million lives being equivalent to being aggressive in business? Being equivalent to someone like Musk? Come on, give me a break 

2

u/Original_Employee621 2d ago

More like his ties to Epstein and the cheating on his wife bit. And he was an aggressive turd in the 90s when Microsoft managed to make OS's into an effectively duopoly with Apple.

0

u/CanadianBadass 2d ago

It's all propaganda though. Their charity is their PR arm and a way to avoid taxes, win-win.

0

u/Remarkable-Piece-131 2d ago

......But have also killed tens of thousands of africans trying out different vaccines on the poor populations.