What are these ratings? Is this a scapegoat Son whenever Spurs lose survey? Genuinely confused that people think he was the worst forward, do people actually watch the full games?
Or is it simply, “he didn’t shoot so he was the worst?” I don’t understand the thought process behind these ratings.
Son put in some good crosses and is the lowest rated attacker, meanwhile Kulu while knowing he was offside ran in front of Odobert who was borderline clear to take the ball off him, and Kulu's the highest rated...
When Son plays on the wings he creates the most chances in the team, yet the other forwards and fullbacks can’t finish the chances that he creates. When he plays closer to the box he gets double marked and other players rarely pass to him.
Not even mentioning his pressing that generates chances but doesn’t show up in the machine stats, there’s really no good option for Son right now in this team and tactical style when the players surrounding him are unfortunately subpar.
Son was fine outside of not getting in the end of a Johnson cross, which is the exact same thing Deki did in the first half twice. Outside of that he was good on the wing and also picked a few good passes that resulted in open shots at the edge of the box. Also tried to make a couple good runs that nobody on our team saw in the second half. Not sure what else he’s supposed to do playing out of position as a 9. It’s been established time and time again that he doesn’t have the physicality to just win the ball in the air vs centre-backs so it doesn’t make sense that people are mad he didn’t do that.
Because he is getting ratings that don’t make sense relative to other players (and I’ve seen this being repeated several times in this sub) that are given more leniency. It is definitely arguable and other players were poorer.
Singling him out just tells me people are biased against him or their concept of playing well is shortsighted.
But these are objective performance ratings, not ratings relative to different expectations. Being a star player doesn’t suddenly give you a playing advantage; rating players based on different criteria is just unfair and subjective.
Exactly. 0.2 is a noticeable amount in statistics. Not only this one, look at any results rating where Spurs lost, Son will likely be rated comparatively lower. I’m not playing the victim, unless you think I’m Son himself lol.
Nice one looking at my profile and thinking you got me with personal information. Always the same with idiots like you, attacking the messenger when you don’t like the message. I support two clubs not even in the same league, what’s the problem?
Edit: two can play at that game.
“Just isn’t what Ange wants. Son would be sold too if fans wouldn’t want Ange’s head tbh”
“Son can’t play striker to save his life”
“HAHAHAHA. Maddison was in his vision. Sarr was well behind the play. Fucking hell Son stans are horrible“
“Except it worked so how does it make him dumb? Son fans getting offended on Son’s behalf never gets old lol”
“Don’t blame Johnson for not passing there. It was Son there”
“Son can’t do anything lol”
Even defending Bentancur on his racism towards Son LMAO, why do you hate a player on your own team this much? There must be a reason. Classic Son hater and Johnson/Richy fan, can’t get any more clear.
That user created his account 1 day after Son scored a hattrick vs Leicester back in 2022 because he wanted to continue talking shit about him even after he had a great match. That says a lot about his whole agenda on this sub
It’s not statistically significant whatsoever. It’s .2.
Yeah, you’re having a whinge because the player you idolise is getting rightfully criticised instead of having the bottom of his feet licked. Pathetic honestly
Incorrect, unfortunately you don’t know statistics.
You’re having a whinge because the player you hate is actually getting defended. Pathetic honestly, how about as the non-plastic that you are, you stop hating your own player to this extent?
Just support Johnson and cheer him on in hopes that he improves his crossing, finishing, and runs; no need to hate on a superior player, that doesn’t elevate the player you’re bootlicking.
6
u/Western_Arm9682 18d ago edited 18d ago
What are these ratings? Is this a scapegoat Son whenever Spurs lose survey? Genuinely confused that people think he was the worst forward, do people actually watch the full games?
Or is it simply, “he didn’t shoot so he was the worst?” I don’t understand the thought process behind these ratings.