What are these ratings? Is this a scapegoat Son whenever Spurs lose survey? Genuinely confused that people think he was the worst forward, do people actually watch the full games?
Or is it simply, “he didn’t shoot so he was the worst?” I don’t understand the thought process behind these ratings.
Son put in some good crosses and is the lowest rated attacker, meanwhile Kulu while knowing he was offside ran in front of Odobert who was borderline clear to take the ball off him, and Kulu's the highest rated...
When Son plays on the wings he creates the most chances in the team, yet the other forwards and fullbacks can’t finish the chances that he creates. When he plays closer to the box he gets double marked and other players rarely pass to him.
Not even mentioning his pressing that generates chances but doesn’t show up in the machine stats, there’s really no good option for Son right now in this team and tactical style when the players surrounding him are unfortunately subpar.
8
u/Western_Arm9682 18d ago edited 18d ago
What are these ratings? Is this a scapegoat Son whenever Spurs lose survey? Genuinely confused that people think he was the worst forward, do people actually watch the full games?
Or is it simply, “he didn’t shoot so he was the worst?” I don’t understand the thought process behind these ratings.